So I guess we all really have a choice here, or do we? How much tech do we want and when do we really want to be “upgraded” to the latest technology? Or maybe it’s just the age-old question of how we manage our time at work vs. time we have with family and friends. But unfortunately, it just seems more difficult to make these distinctions when we are “connected” all the time. Not an easy or simple answer for many “bread winners” in the twenty-first century.
One busy professional reflected on this in this Sunday’s NY Times: “My personal mode of self-restraint (controlling her life) is to always carry my phone when I am not with my kids and always leave it in the other room when I am. The kids themselves don’t get phones at all. When my 12-year-old daughter walks home from school without one, I intentionally have no idea where she is, just like nobody knew where their kids were when I was growing up. How rare it is these days not to be able to know something.”
And as I mentioned in an earlier blog, we can easily know more in any given moment than we have ever have before, but how much do we really retain in the longer term? Technology can make it so, but it is really still only a tool to help us remember, and we have to do the rest to “upgrade” our lives.
P.S. I will take a late summer break this week, but will be back next Monday, August 28
So what’s really wrong with walking around with your eyes on your mobile phones while passerbys navigate their way around you? More dangerous is the practice of driving while texting in terms of disregard for your own safety and that of others. In the past the only similar practice I can recall that was seen as more of an anti-social behavior than a hazard to your own safety and others was keeping your “nose in a book.” But I don’t recall seeing many people driving while reading an old-fashioned “hardbound” or paperback text. At least I don’t think there were many car collisions attributed to people reading paperbacks while driving.
More disconcerting or hazardous (at least to me) are the anti-social implications of keeping your head down at social gatherings and not meeting or conversing with old friends and new acquaintances. Being online there are always friends and family you can chose to be connected with and never be “out of touch.” While you may chose to never have your head “in the clouds” again, you may also find yourself trapped in the world of social media to the detriment of having a real time “social life.” I know I am portraying the extremes of a social media obsession, and that my observations are not scientifically based, but please take a look at your own social media life. There may also be a generational gap here, and a personal preference for what constitutes a broader social life. It still remains your own personal choice in terms of what “worlds” we chose to habitate and to what degree.
So now let’s look up and smell and see the roses!
Back in my Peace Corps years, we were all eager to change the world. At least over a thousand of us who were in India in the mid to late sixties, but that all changed when Indira Gandhi sent us home. I have been back to India on two different occasions over the past decade. Technology has played a major role in India’s economic growth as a source of customer service and technical support to the rest of the world. But now many current local Indian authorities are increasingly clamping down on Internet and telecommunications access across the country. They have cited national security as the primary reason for restricting access. It also seems that local and state officials can conjure up other rationales. In one case, officials suspended social media apps to prevent cheating during a state exam for government accountant positions.
If India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi wants to show American investors that his country has “the most open economy in the world,” he would do well to address these local practices from the national level. As I was often reminded during those Peace Corps years, India is the world’s largest democracy! The Indian government has taken steps to bring the country into the 21st Century: Its policies to reduce red tape, attract foreign businesses and expand digital services have enormous potential. It would be a shameful regression if these reforms fail to reach that potential because of suspended WiFi.
I know that Prime Minister Modi is not trying to change the world like those idealistic Peace Corps Volunteers of the sixties, but I believe that he can do something to preserve India’s digital future.
Ray Myers India 29
“Have laptop, will travel,” could be an alternative title for this blog, but I am getting a little tired of all this alternative wordsmithing. Aren’t you? What’s in a name after all. But when you put “digital” with “wanderlust” I do get a little concerned and confused. Carrying your laptop to a foreign destination does not quite have the same connotation or actual experience of “living” in a foreign land. These digital nomads typically travel to and work in another culture for a 30-day co-working experience. So it truly becomes a shared work experience for a small group of like-minded technological-savy individuals coming from a wide variety of countries, averaging in age from the mid- to late 20s and 30s.
The two main groups that seem attracted to this cross-cultural experience are millenials interested in taking time off from traditional work and aging baby-boomers who have financial resources and flexibility. Could be a life-changing experience, but I am not sure that having all the latest technology will make it so. In fact, it might get in the way. As one of the past participants noted: “The opportunity to go live in a foreign city for a month and interact with the local people and experience their culture – that’s priceless to me. But culturally, we need to understand each other for the world to work, and this is a way to achieve that.”
Understanding each others’ cultures may not always be a simple, painless process. But in the end, I think these digital nomads will easily benefit more in terms of what they learn and experience in these cultures than in what they may have contributed technologically.
Remember the old “Yellow Pages” ad when you were encouraged to let your fingers do the walking. Now it seems that you may be letting your fingers do the driving. Autonomous driving, electric cars and ride-hailing apps from Silicon Valley, like Uber, are reshaping transportation. Young people no longer feel as compelled as previous generations to own cars. Experts in the transportation sector are changing rapidly. The whole “mobility market” – transportation as a service – is just at the beginning.
In Germany, under an initiative called Industry 4.0, they are striving to help the country thrive in a smartphone world. The future of Germany as an industrial nation depends on how companies succeed in bringing the manufacturing and digital worlds together. Industry executives there often cite how Apple’s iPhone quickly erased Nokia’s once-dominant position in the mobile handset market, and they are determined not to let something similar to happen to them. Google is also entering the driverless car market. Their market value is more than double that of BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen combined. So instead of owning and driving your own car, you may soon find that your smartphone could be the best means of “ride-hailing” you have. It will enable you to chose the most convenient means of vehicular travel available to you at any given place and time.
But I wouldn’t get rid of your new BMW, Mercedes, or Volkswagen quite yet. Maybe you can become a ride service provider yourself. You can let your passengers work/play on their iPhones while you enjoy the ride. That may even be more fun.
So it seems that the city of Indianapolis has some ideas of its own in terms of making that part of America “great again.” Some young professionals see “digital” opportunity there in contrast to Trump’s plan to bring back those manufacturing “hub” cities (and jobs) of the last century. And guess who used to be Governor there, Vice-President Mike Pence. Not only is he in favor of bringing back the good old days, he also wants to bring back that “old time religion.”
Then Governor Pence ruffled the feathers of the tech industry back in 2015 when he signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act which allowed businesses to cite religion as a reason to refuse to serve customers – a move that people say was aimed at the gay community. To his critics that alleged such discriminatory intent, he has responded that he was simply trying to ensure religious freedom? Unfortunately, this legislation has had a chilling effect in terms of the growth of Indiana’s economy across many business sectors. Some technology entrepreneurs and engineers, however, still see opportunity there. Many see a chance to play a larger role there than they might have had in Silicon Valley.
A larger role, perhaps, but with less of a salary that she could have earned in Silicon Valley. Many young professionals simply like living in a “prime Midwestern technology center.”
Who really wants to read a factual news story any more? I guess we have come to a time when Americans would rather read fiction over fact, but we are talking about news reporters, not novelists. Just make it up and see who buys it? The “reporters” at the Liberty Writers News are doing exactly that, and being paid handsomely for it. They are making the average American’s yearly salary in one month. Why not fake it. Is the truth really that important? Well after the recent Presidential election here in the States, I am starting to wonder myself.
Don’t trust the mainstream media. Just read what you like or want to hear. It’s more entertaining and you can make up your own stories, and make money doing it while print newspapers keep losing readership and revenue. The news media now encompasses the digital news that doesn’t seem to need facts as much as a vivid imagination. This explosion of fake news has further eroded the media landscape.
Even Mark Zuckerberg is perplexed. Facebook is trying to find the “right place” between censorship and propagating dangerous untruths. My advice is to work hard on finding those dangerous untruths. I wouldn’t call it censorship. Let’s say “fact checking.”
My apologies, but I couldn’t resist paraphrasing this “Donald Trumpism.” It’s just that now is that time of year when education publishers, and now tech companies, start to unveil the latest and most exciting “products” for the next school term beginning in September. So, I think the big news here is the dramatic change in the traditional textbook sales business. Here is a more professional analysis from the Software and Information Industry Association: “Schools in the United States spend more than $8.3 billion annually on software and digital content . . . That spending could grow significantly as school districts that now buy physical textbooks, assessment tests, professional development resources for teachers and administrative materials shift to digital systems.” Goodbye, Mr. Chips!
This trend has certainly not gone unnoticed in the digital publishing world. Publishing giants such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and in online higher education, edX, have easily recognized the business value of making their products and services more available digitally. The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) is now holding its annual 2016 convention in Denver this year, and if you attend the proceedings there with 16,000 other teachers and school officials, or follow them remotely, you will be introduced to these new digital ventures in a more formal way. Remember the days when you had to go to the Bookstore each semester?
Please believe me that I am not really trying to be nostalgic, well maybe a little. During my college summers I packed and shipped textbooks to university campuses in the U.S. for the Collier-Macmillan Publishing Company. Now technology can do all that for you personally. I often wonder if I have actually been replaced by a robot?
An idea whose time has come? Well, maybe it’s not quite that dramatic, but any initiative to reduce the costs of higher education must be welcome news for families and students struggling to gain more educational opportunity in the most economical way. One organization in particular, Achieving the American Dream, is leading this effort to accomplish two things that are crucial to increase higher education completion rates for first-generation, low-income and students of color. These “roadblocks” are basically the inordinately high textbook costs themselves, and the absence of a “new vehicle for using technology and course materials in dynamic and engaging ways.”
Although a number of community colleges have partnered with philanthropic organizations to reduce textbook costs, four-year institutions have been the primary beneficiaries of open-source innovations. Research suggests that the use of free open-access materials can significantly reduce costs and contribute to better grades, higher course completion and faster degree completion.
So now I know why I had all the difficulty in getting good grades in college. If only I had access to open-source materials back then, I would have gotten better grades, completed all my courses, graduated sooner, and saved some money. From a 21st Century parents’ perspective those must all be good things!
Technology to the rescue! When I first read that Syria’s Assad had ousted the ISIS militants from Palmyra, I took little notice since I am not really sure if any news is actually good news anymore in that part of the world. But it seems that with Palmyra now in the hands of the Syrian government, one can only hope that Syrian leaders will become more actively engaged in the reconstruction of these archaeological treasures.
Modern technology has also made the reconstruction of damaged historic landmarks possible through the use of 3D computer modeling generated from dozens of photographs taken by archaeologists over the years. Fortunately, Palmyra has benefitted from the growing popularity of digital archaeology as a new frontier in the preservation of ancient architectural jewels. Now here is where the robots come in. These photographs can be put into a database, and once experts are confident that the computer model contains all the structural information necessary, a file is sent to Italy where robots carve the reproduction from blocks of Egyptian marble.
The fact that these marvelous structures were destroyed by man’s wanton disregard for past civilizations’ treasures, or plundered for personal or political gain, should enrage us all. This is but one example of how the ravages of war can destroy marvels from mankind’s past. In a very important way technology has the power to help us preserve archaeological wonders in spite of man’s wanton destruction.
Too busy this holiday season or any other time of the year to write handwritten notes, no problem! You now have Bond, not James, who can take care of all that for you. In this case, technology will reproduce your own handwriting, or any other if you prefer, and dispatch all of these carefully crafted personalized missives for you. Now, of course, there is a price for this convenience, but who has the time any more to send all these “thank-yous,” and all I can tell you is that Bond’s business is booming, at least in the New York area.
Good manners and good business sense all wrapped into one thanks to robotics. These robots, however, can be programmed to write in your own handwritten script or any other you may prefer. There are currently 200 robotic writing machines in Bond’s Manhattan facilities. An invitation only service costs $1,200 a year and provides clients with a personalized mobile app to send notes in their own handwriting on custom stationary. Other personalized messaging services range from $3.50 to $2.50 per card (corporate accounts with large orders).
Most customers like the fact that it is more than a text message, and is perceived as a more thoughtful sentiment. No one will ever have to know it came from a robot! And it comes in an envelope with a wax seal, a very thoughtful, personal touch, from anybody or a machine.
I’ve got some good news and some bad news. It actually may be all good or all bad depending on your perspective, but here’s how things seem to be going. Business advertisers in all fields realize that reaching their potential customer base may involve more investment in more digital outreach. If you would like fewer commercials on TV, this will be the good news. But if you would not like receiving more digital advertising on your computers and laptops, this will be the bad news.
Advertising experts expect this all to happen over the next couple years. And if you think having a mobile device will exempt you from this advertising tidal wave, I am sorry to inform you that it is only a matter of time (unless you really like getting all these ads). By 2018 mobile ads will account for 50.2 percent of Internet advertising, surpassing desktop ads for the first time. Why waste money on TV advertising, when I can send you an ad that will be delivered to the mobile device in your pocket or purse?
Probably safe to say that most people will be looking at their mobile phones more than they will be watching TV. It’s just a matter of time. But I have forgetten that we live in the age of multi-tasking. Why not do both?
Ours is now a world of constant communication. We can reach colleagues, friends, and family in an instant thanks to our technological connectivity anywhere from wherever we may be. It’s hard to imagine that it has not always been this way. And as teachers struggle with implementing technology in their classrooms in the most advantageous ways for all students, they often find technology getting in the way. With students’ heads bowed scanning the screens of their iPads or other digital devices, teachers must often compete for some modicum of attention for a lesson they are presenting.
Maybe there’s really nothing new about this classroom phenomenon. Teachers have been competing for students’ undivided attention since the days of Aristotle but the most consequential outcome in the digital age may be the loss of students’ conversational and broader social skills. As one writer expresses it: “Kids have to use their five senses, and, most of all, they have to talk to each other.” In a recent Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development study across more than three dozen countries (not including the United States), moderate computer use in school results in modest academic gains. More frequent or heavy computer use has a negative impact on student learning.
So students in the digital age may actually be learning less as they use their computers more. Besides turning off or moderating their use of digital devices, what should these young people do. Maybe have a face-to-face conversation with someone?
Got to have those 45s! This phenomenon appears to be more than a nostalgic whim. but I am sure that it plays some part. Some say that the marginalization of the physical (e.g., 45 rpm records) has propelled it into the realm of luxury. But perhaps the biggest irony is that the best place to locate and buy analog items is online. Maybe it really doesn’t matter how you get it, so much as it is the ownership of something that is both sensual and symbolic. It’s reviving an old fashioned consumer experience: you are the “owner” of the latest from a favorite musician, author, film maker, and so on.
At the same time, analog fever does not function in opposition to digital dominance, but in concert with it. YouTube video clips actually show analog social media devices that may be of interest to viewers. No more streaming if that’s not for you. You get to own what you like, and control its access as you determine best. And this is now called a “luxury” that we had lost in the digital world.
I’m old enough now to have lived in both the analog and digital worlds. I guess it’s all about ownership, independence, and prized possessions. Maybe it’s like handing or texting someone a reading list of favorite books as opposed to actually sharing the books themselves?
From explorations in outer space to studying and preserving insect specimens on earth, digital technology is surely one of our most powerful tools in these quests. Individual specimen collections can now be digitally photographed from hundreds of angles and made available in 3-D on the web. These collections would easily fill hundreds of cabinets in any natural history museum around the world.
The Museum of Natural History in Berlin and the Florida Museum of Natural History are two examples of such online collections that are easily accessible from your preferred digital device. At the same time, you can still make the trip and view these specimens in person, but I think you will probably have a better view looking at a digital screen.
And of course, if you still prefer, you can resurrect your butterfly net (if you ever had one), and chase all these dazzling species in their natural habitats. Unfortunately in our digital age, this may not seem as appealing as perhaps it once was. Maybe there is really no need to chase these beautiful creatures when we can search and “capture” them on our computer screens. Or you still might simply enjoy watching them on some sunny summer day and admire their natural beauty.
I don’t go to the movies that often. And now with all of our digital wizardry we will be able to see new releases on our own personal devices much sooner than we ever thought possible, if the movie industry agrees. Why go to the movie theaters at all? It use to be a great place to take a date (maybe some of you remember?)
It the movie companies all agree, which they have not, we may have made “going to the movies” a thing of the past, making it a more personal, individual experience, like reading a book, digitally or the old-fashioned printed page way. Take your pick, but it seems that everything is moving in a “faster is better” way. At the same time, there are so many more ways to access any information or entertainment you want at any time. OstensIbly, this will make everything fit into your busy and busier daily schedules more easily. But how much more do you want, and how much time do you have?
For a more “senior” person like me, more time is certainly available, and I have the freedom to control the amount of time spent in the digital and real worlds. But with so many more digital devices easily available, it can become so much easier to live life exclusively digitally. Unfortunately of you do, you may miss having a real life that can combine the best aspects of both.