Last Saturday in Washington, D.C. (and in more than 600 cities worldwide) Bill. Nye, the Science Guy, was one of the Leaders of the nationally-organized March for Science (technology a strong enabler). He addressed the crowds this way: “Greetings, fellow citizens. We are marching today to remind people everywhere, our lawmakers especially, of the significance of science for our health and prosperity.” Meanwhile in the White House, a few hundred yards away, “so-called President” Trump was putting the finishing touches on a one-page news bulletin detailing the tax benefits and major reductions for the wealthiest Americans in his new plan. I don’t think he was as concerned about insuring continued scientific progress that would advance Americans’ “health and prosperity.” To the contrary, he was still working on how to repeal and replace Obamacare.
Trump would have us all believe that our planet is NOT environmentally endangered. Unfortunately, he is also being supported by a rise of anti-scientific notions – the anti-vaccination movement and climate-change denial in particular. Nye argues that “When you become scientifically literate, I claim, you become an environmentalist. Somewhere along the way, there has developed this idea that if you believe something hard enough, it’s as true as things discovered through the process of science. And I will say that’s objectively wrong.”
Thank you, Bill Nye. May we all “Live long and prosper!” 🖖
India and the United States are separated by thousand of miles of land and ocean unlike our Mexican neighbors whom the “so-called” President fears will flood into our country across our southern border. Let’s build a wall. You are not welcome in Trumpland! Whether perceived or real, many potential Indian emigres to the United States also now see a different America where they had hoped to work in the Information Technology sector. Many of their countrymen are already here by virtue of the H-1B visa program. More than 85,000 such visas are granted yearly, the majority to Indians.
“Generations of Indians have admired the United States for almost everything. But many are infuriated and unnerved by what they see as a wave of racist violence under . . . Trump, souring American allure. The reaction is not just anger and anxiety. Now young Indians who have aspired to study, live and work in the United States are looking elsewhere (NY Times, 4/24).” In their eyes, they soon saw that the anti-immigrant rage in America did not discriminate. In what was once seen as the promised land, “they now might just think that we’re terrorists.” Is this really how we will Make America Great Again? I think we will be going in the other direction, making America a bastion of prejudice and nativism that will make us a lesser, NOT greater nation.
As expressed by one Indian businessman: “The U.S. has been such a good country with such good policies, and this guy comes to power, and you don’t know what he might actually do.”
Do you ever think of social media as a business that has to be regulated in order to ensure fair competition in this marketing space. In the period of ten years we have gone from a time when the American marketplace was dominated by companies such as Exxon Mobil, General Electric, Microsoft, Citigroup and Bank of America to a new era of technology companies replacing them in the size of their market caps. Microsoft remains in the middle of this group at #3, but is now joined by its largest tech competitors: Apple (1), Alphabet (2, Google parent company), Amazon (4), and Facebook (5). We may eventually have to regulate these tech giants if they are determined to truly be monopolies that limit competition by smaller tech businesses in this space.
“We are going to have to decide fairly soon whether Google, Facebook and Amazon are the kinds of natural monopolies that need to be regulated, or whether we allow the status quo to continue, pretending that unfettered monoliths don’t inflict damage on our privacy and democracy. It is impossible to deny that Facebook, Google and Amazon have stymied innovation on a broad scale. To begin with, the platforms of Google and Facebook are the point of access to all media for the majority of Americans. While profits at Google, Facebook and Amazon have soared, revenues in media businesses like newspaper publishing or the music business have, since 2001, fallen by 70 percent.” So most Americans can now “proudly” say that they only know what they see on their computer screens (of varying sizes). Maybe this is really how all those fake news stories began?
Fewer newspaper readers, but more “screen” readers. Let’s face it, our social media markets are like the Wild West of the Digital Age. Maybe we do need a few Marshall Dillons to protect all of us law-abiding citizens (anyone remember Gunsmoke?).
I am not making this up. Just ask the so-called President Donald Trump. It’s all about H-1B visas which I truly know nothing about, but I think the real issue is Trump’s unfortunate tunnel vision abou how he will “make America Great Again.” Shall we call this xenophobia? Yes, let’s! And Trumps’ followers love it. This is not the American way!
So let’s get to the heart of this issue. “Some critics of the H-1B visa program say that there are more than enough Americans to fill all the technical jobs in the United States. But tech executives have long said that there are not enough Americans with th advanced math and science skills necessary to succeed in their companies.” Unfortunately, some tech industry employees are now living under a worry of being unwelcome in the country where they “hadn’t really felt that way before.”
Are we really making America Great Again?
P.S. Sorry about the late posting today. Back on Monday at earlier time.
I will be blogging again on Friday. Too much Easter celebration this week. My apologies. Thanks.
So-called President Trump’s most recent budget proposal for NASA climate science missions would eliminate four climate science missions. In one paragraph in their 53-page budget blueprint, the Trump administration proposed the elimination of instrumentation to study clouds, small airborne particles, the flow of carbon dioxide and other elements of the atmosphere and ocean. I guess if we successfully fail to find these programs, we will never really know if our climate is really changing. But maybe that’s really the point of not collecting this information? “What you don’t know can’t hurt you.”
Unfortunately in this case, it really can hurt you. We are talking about the quality of the air we breathe and the water we drink, as just two examples of our natural environment that help sustain all life on this earth. “Climate change deniers” now have a friend in the White House. Long before Trump was elected, climate researchers have warned that the nation’s climate monitoring capabilities – which include satellite as well as air and surface-based instruments- were less than adequate and faced data collection gaps and other uncertainties. Elimination of any of these missions would severely limit our ability to monitor the effects on our fragile ecosystems. Without such critical information, we are truly endangering the quality of life for all living organisms on this earth. Al Gore was right. This is an inconvenient truth, and one that current political leadership simply wants to deny.
We must see the world, our future and that of our children’s from a broader view. We owe it to ourselves and to the generations that follow. We do have to worry, as inconvenient as that may be.
P.S. I will be back next Wednesday after a short Easter break. Thank you for following TechtoExpress.
Tell me about it! Unfortunately, my wife is a small business owner who has suffered through this business reality. Consumers now have the edge in dominating the traditional retail market in their ability to make the best purchasing decisions. They easily can compare product quality and prices with the devices they hold in the palms of their hands. Technology has made it so. At the same time, general merchandise stores are “shedding” retail jobs since today’s consumers obviously need less customer service in making their purchasing decisions. You can find all of the needed information online. Just consider that general merchandise stores shed 34,700 jobs in March alone.
“E-commerce and technology have absolutely changed the rules of the game and given massive amounts of power to the consumer. There is a self-help mentality now. People walk around with their phones in their hand to tell them the best model and the best price. You don’t need as many people walking around trying to convince you to by a sweater.” Or almost anything else you might need.” So in a sense, consumers are now skipping the “middle man or woman.” It’s just you and your technology that can help in making your purchasing decisions. Something’s lost, but something’s gained? You have become your own best “personal shopper,” with a little help from your own technological devices and prowess.
Or maybe it’s all about consuming different things differently. One E-commerce expert recently noted that “there has been a shift in consumer spending from things to experiences, that’s why restaurants are doing so well.”
“Have laptop, will travel,” could be an alternative title for this blog, but I am getting a little tired of all this alternative wordsmithing. Aren’t you? What’s in a name after all. But when you put “digital” with “wanderlust” I do get a little concerned and confused. Carrying your laptop to a foreign destination does not quite have the same connotation or actual experience of “living” in a foreign land. These digital nomads typically travel to and work in another culture for a 30-day co-working experience. So it truly becomes a shared work experience for a small group of like-minded technological-savy individuals coming from a wide variety of countries, averaging in age from the mid- to late 20s and 30s.
The two main groups that seem attracted to this cross-cultural experience are millenials interested in taking time off from traditional work and aging baby-boomers who have financial resources and flexibility. Could be a life-changing experience, but I am not sure that having all the latest technology will make it so. In fact, it might get in the way. As one of the past participants noted: “The opportunity to go live in a foreign city for a month and interact with the local people and experience their culture – that’s priceless to me. But culturally, we need to understand each other for the world to work, and this is a way to achieve that.”
Understanding each others’ cultures may not always be a simple, painless process. But in the end, I think these digital nomads will easily benefit more in terms of what they learn and experience in these cultures than in what they may have contributed technologically.
So-called President Trump continues to play the role of Big Brother allowing big business interests to have their way in finding out more about the lives of everyday Americans. As reported in the New York Times (NOT fake news or alternative facts) recent changes in rulings by the Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.) will now allow broadband internet service providers, such as cable and telecommunications companies, to track and sell a customer’s online information with greater ease. I think the operative word here is “sell.” What a deal for our internet service providers. You pay them for a service and they, in turn, can sell your personal data to whomever they want. So this is what “Making America Great Again” is all about? Sounds a little more like how they might do it, say, in Russia!
“Some technology policy experts said that jettisoning the rules would allow broadband providers to collect customers’ internet browsing histories and other personal data and sell them to advertisers with little government oversight or fear of enforcement. Self-regulation and market competition, they said, may not sufficiently protect consumers.” So as Joe Biden might say, this is a “big f#*%+^~ deal.” It’ pretty difficult today to walk away, or live without, Internet service altogether.
But why should I worry? I am really not online that much of the time, but I still have this suspicious feeling that somebody just wants to know more about my online life so they can sell me something? And I hope that’s all it is.
The title of this post may be a bit of an exaggeration, but technological advances now make it possible to build your own house if you have a mobile construction 3D printer that is capable of printing whole buildings completely on-site. Based on recent experiences in the actually construction of such homes, the estimated total cost could be $10,134, or $25 per square foot, when using the highest quality materials. The cost includes the foundation, roof, interior and exterior walls, wall insulation, windows, floors and suspended ceiling. The company Apis Cor continues to develop the techniques and improve upon the cost per square foot; its product could have enormous benefits for providing affordable housing and allowing for faster recovery after natural disasters.
The term “3D printing” gives way to “additive manufacturing” for industrial use. It differs from standard manufacturing processes of starting with your raw materials and then removing from them in the form of cutting, drilling, machining, and so on – all of which leave you with material waste. Additive manufacturing means that you start with nothing and only add what you need. This is true in the construction industry as well. It seems like both a financially responsible and environmentally friendly goal to have a process that would help to eliminate additional resources and the potential for a pile of construction waste at the end of the project. The technology also allows for different methods of printing walls to achieve the desired thermal insulation.
These hi-tech homes could be very convenient “spaces” to house unexpected overnight guests and relatives. I would not recommend, however, that in-laws be included in this category.)